Methodology note
Cut crypto CGT to 10%: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Cut crypto CGT to 10% scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
Central fiscal result
+GBP 0.5bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28
Low case: -GBP 1.0bn. High case: +GBP 5.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Crypto capital gains are taxed at 10%.
- A two-year sandbox and banking access rules are introduced.
- Tax payments in crypto are operationally enabled.
- Bitcoin reserve size is unspecified and not central.
Affected population
- Affected units are crypto investors, exchanges, banks and HMRC.
- Reform says about 7m UK residents hold crypto.
- High-income investors likely account for much taxable gain.
- Tax administrators face valuation and compliance risks.
Gross impact
- Central case assumes lower CGT loses more than compliance gains.
- Low case assumes declarations and onshore activity increase receipts.
- High case includes reserve losses or large tax-base erosion.
- Sandbox administration is small.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Crypto CGT rate cut: +GBP 0.8bn
- Higher declarations and activity: -GBP 0.3bn
- Regulation and HMRC systems: +GBP 0.1bn
- Bitcoin reserve central effect: -GBP 0.1bn
Central net impact: +GBP 0.5bn in 2027-28.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes lower rates bring gains onshore and improve compliance.
- Central case assumes modest compliance gain and some revenue loss.
- High case assumes tax-base erosion and adverse reserve valuation.
- Crypto volatility dominates short-run receipts.
Phasing
- 2026-27: +GBP 0.2bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: +GBP 0.5bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: +GBP 0.8bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: +GBP 0.8bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- S1: Reform crypto bill defines 10% CGT, sandbox and reserve.
- S2: HMRC CGT ready-reckoners show behavioural uncertainty.
- S3: Crypto economics literature cautions about volatility and network effects.
- S4: No official reserve size was specified.
- S5: Consumer-protection costs are not fully known.
- S6: Crypto-economics studies inform volatility, network and reserve-risk assumptions.