Methodology note
Cap foreign aid at GBP 1bn: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Cap foreign aid at GBP 1bn scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
Central fiscal result
-GBP 6.5bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28
Low case: -GBP 10.0bn. High case: -GBP 3.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- UK ODA is capped at GBP 1bn annually.
- The baseline reflects the planned move toward 0.3% of GNI.
- Unspecified exceptions are not assumed centrally.
- No replacement security or refugee fund is included.
Affected population
- Affected units are aid programmes, recipients and UK suppliers.
- FCDO and multilateral programmes face the largest cuts.
- Domestic aid contractors and charities lose work.
- UK taxpayers receive the saving.
Gross impact
- 2025 provisional ODA was GBP 13.0bn.
- A GBP 1bn cap implies very large cuts before baseline adjustment.
- Central saving is GBP 6.5bn in 2027-28.
- Low saving assumes broad exemptions and existing cuts.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- ODA programme savings: -GBP 7.5bn
- Contract exit and transition costs: +GBP 0.5bn
- Replacement diplomatic/security spending: +GBP 0.5bn
- Administration and uncertainty: +GBP 0.0bn
Central net impact: -GBP 6.5bn in 2027-28.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low saving case assumes aid baseline has already fallen sharply.
- Central case assumes most programmes are cut but obligations remain.
- High saving case assumes few exemptions and rapid cancellation.
- Macroeconomic effects are mostly outside UK GDP.
Phasing
- 2026-27: -GBP 3.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: -GBP 6.5bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: -GBP 7.0bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: -GBP 7.5bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- S1: Reform page specifies GBP 1bn cap and claimed savings.
- S2: FCDO provisional ODA shows GBP 13.0bn spend in 2025.
- S3: OBR public-finance data sets fiscal context.
- S4: Aid-growth studies show mixed recipient-country effects, not a UK fiscal offset.
- S5: Exemptions were not specified clearly.