Liberal Democrats - Migration
Allow asylum seekers to work
Allow asylum seekers to work after three months while cutting the asylum backlog.
Last updated: May 2026.
Policy baseline
Party costings claim GBP 4.29bn savings from backlog reduction and work rights. That requires large administrative delivery gains.
- Targets asylum seekers awaiting decisions.
- Savings come from accommodation and support costs.
- Work rights add tax receipts.
Core trade-offs
The direct beneficiaries are asylum seekers and taxpayers if costs fall. The costs fall mainly on some local services and low-wage labour markets. The main economic question is backlog savings may be slower than claimed.
- Asylum seekers and taxpayers if costs fall gain most directly.
- Costs fall mainly on some local services and low-wage labour markets.
- Key risk: backlog savings may be slower than claimed.
Fiscal impact by 2028-29
-GBP 4.5bn to +GBP 0.5bn. Central estimate: -GBP 2.0bn.
- Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
- Main channel is the scored tax, spending or delivery change.
- Offsets depend on tax receipts, behaviour and pass-through.
- Range reflects uncertain implementation and economic response.
- This is not an official costing.
Economic impact by 2028-29
- Jobs: More legal work may raise labour supply; enforcement costs depend on capacity.
- Wages: Eligible asylum seekers gain wages; some local low-wage competition may rise.
- Prices: Lower accommodation costs may reduce public procurement pressure.
- GDP / productivity: Likely positive if work rights replace enforced inactivity and costly support.
Assessment
This is a real trade-off, not a free gain. Asylum seekers and taxpayers if costs fall benefit, while some local services and low-wage labour markets bear most costs. Overall output depends on behaviour, capacity and pass-through.
Confidence: Medium-low. Higher on the policy target and fiscal channel; lower on behaviour, pass-through and economy-wide effects.
Main risks
- Capacity risk: Backlog, processing and enforcement constraints may limit savings.
- Local pressure: Short-run housing and services pressure may remain.
- Wage effects: Low-wage labour supply can affect some local workers.
Safeguards
- Grant work rights with rapid processing.
- Track support-cost and tax changes.
- Coordinate local housing and services.
Academic evidence
Dustmann and Frattini, Economic Journal, 2014
Immigration fiscal effects
UK immigrants’ fiscal effects vary by cohort and skill, not just by migrant status.
Relevant to asylum work and labour-market policy.
Manacorda, Manning and Wadsworth, Economic Journal, 2012
Immigration and wages
UK immigration affected wages unevenly, with stronger effects among some migrant groups.
Relevant to labour-market migration measures.
UK government evidence
Liberal Democrats, 2024
Liberal Democrat manifesto
The manifesto gives announced policy detail across health, care, housing, taxes and climate.
Used to define the policy scenarios.
Liberal Democrats, 2024
Liberal Democrat costings
Party costings give 2028-29 spending, revenue and investment figures.
Used as starting anchors, not official costings.
Funding a Fair Deal: Liberal Democrat Manifesto Costings (2024)
Sources
- PolicyLens illustrative scenario methodology for allow asylum seekers to work Internal - PolicyLens, 2026
- The Fiscal Effects of Immigration to the UK Academic article - Dustmann and Frattini, Economic Journal, 2014
- Funding a Fair Deal: Liberal Democrat Manifesto Costings Party costing - Liberal Democrats, 2024
- The Impact of Immigration on Wages Academic article - Manacorda, Manning and Wadsworth, Economic Journal, 2012
- For a Fair Deal: Liberal Democrat Manifesto 2024 Party policy source - Liberal Democrats, 2024
Other Liberal Democrats policies
PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.