Reform UK - Agriculture
Raise farming budget to GBP 3bn
Increase England's farming budget to GBP 3bn and replace climate-related farm schemes.
Last updated: May 2026.
Budget baseline
Reform's farm pledge was to increase England's annual farming budget to GBP 3bn, from around GBP 2.4bn, and to scrap climate-related farming subsidies.
- England farming budget was around GBP 2.4bn.
- Target budget is GBP 3bn.
- Climate-scheme design changes materially.
Core trade-offs
Farmers gain more direct support and less scheme complexity. Environmental payments may be weakened, and consumers do not necessarily see lower food prices.
- Farmers gain budget support.
- Taxpayers fund higher spending.
- Environmental outcomes may worsen.
Illustrative fiscal impact
+GBP 0.3bn to +GBP 2.5bn. Central estimate: +GBP 1.0bn.
- Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
- GBP 3bn budget is the main scale marker.
- Gross costs and receipt offsets are separated in methodology.
- Behaviour and pass-through widen the range.
- This is not an official costing.
Economic impact by 2027-28
- Jobs: Supports farm incomes and some rural employment, but labour shortages remain.
- Wages: Farm household incomes may rise; worker wage effects are uncertain.
- Prices: Little guaranteed food-price reduction unless supply expands materially.
- GDP / productivity: Could be neutral or negative if payments weaken environmental productivity and resilience.
Assessment
The policy is a relatively small fiscal item compared with tax pledges, but it still needs clear objectives. More farm support helps producers, especially smaller farms, but scrapping climate-linked schemes risks losing environmental and resilience benefits. Lower consumer prices should not be assumed.
Confidence: Medium-low. Budget figures are reasonably clear, but the replacement scheme and environmental conditions are not.
Main risks
- Environmental loss: Removing climate-linked payments can weaken soil, water and biodiversity outcomes.
- Weak pass-through: Farm subsidies may not materially reduce supermarket food prices.
- Targeting issue: Without caps, larger landowners may capture a high share of support.
Safeguards
- Cap payments by farm size and need.
- Retain soil, water and flood-resilience conditions.
- Publish food-security metrics and subsidy recipients.
Academic evidence
Kirwan, Journal of Political Economy, 2009
Agricultural subsidy incidence
Agricultural subsidies can be partly captured through land rents rather than fully reaching active producers.
Supports scepticism that higher farming budgets all raise farm output.
The Incidence of U.S. Agricultural Subsidies on Farmland Rental Rates (2009)
Auerbach and Gorodnichenko, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2012
Fiscal multipliers vary
Spending multipliers depend on economic slack, openness and policy context.
Informs GDP uncertainty from higher agricultural support.
UK government evidence
Office for Budget Responsibility, 2026
Public finances overview
The OBR expects public receipts of about GBP 1,235bn in 2025-26.
Scale check for large packages.
Reform UK, 2024
Reform spending claims
The Contract claims large savings from departments, QE reserves, aid, welfare and net zero.
Defines scenarios but needs caution.
Sources
- PolicyLens illustrative scenario methodology: Raise farming budget to GBP 3bn Internal - PolicyLens, 2026
- Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy Academic article - Auerbach and Gorodnichenko, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2012
- A brief guide to the public finances Fiscal forecast - Office for Budget Responsibility, 2026
- Our Contract with You Party policy document - Reform UK, 2024
- Update on the farming budget UK government blog - Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2025
- The Incidence of U.S. Agricultural Subsidies on Farmland Rental Rates Academic article - Kirwan, Journal of Political Economy, 2009
- Our Policies Party policy source - Reform UK, 2026
Other Reform UK policies
PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.