PolicyLens

Reform UK - Agriculture

Raise farming budget to GBP 3bn

Increase England's farming budget to GBP 3bn and replace climate-related farm schemes.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Budget baseline

Reform's farm pledge was to increase England's annual farming budget to GBP 3bn, from around GBP 2.4bn, and to scrap climate-related farming subsidies.

  • England farming budget was around GBP 2.4bn.
  • Target budget is GBP 3bn.
  • Climate-scheme design changes materially.

Core trade-offs

Farmers gain more direct support and less scheme complexity. Environmental payments may be weakened, and consumers do not necessarily see lower food prices.

  • Farmers gain budget support.
  • Taxpayers fund higher spending.
  • Environmental outcomes may worsen.

Illustrative fiscal impact

+GBP 0.3bn to +GBP 2.5bn. Central estimate: +GBP 1.0bn.

  • Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • GBP 3bn budget is the main scale marker.
  • Gross costs and receipt offsets are separated in methodology.
  • Behaviour and pass-through widen the range.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2027-28

  • Jobs: Supports farm incomes and some rural employment, but labour shortages remain.
  • Wages: Farm household incomes may rise; worker wage effects are uncertain.
  • Prices: Little guaranteed food-price reduction unless supply expands materially.
  • GDP / productivity: Could be neutral or negative if payments weaken environmental productivity and resilience.

Assessment

The policy is a relatively small fiscal item compared with tax pledges, but it still needs clear objectives. More farm support helps producers, especially smaller farms, but scrapping climate-linked schemes risks losing environmental and resilience benefits. Lower consumer prices should not be assumed.

Confidence: Medium-low. Budget figures are reasonably clear, but the replacement scheme and environmental conditions are not.

Main risks

  • Environmental loss: Removing climate-linked payments can weaken soil, water and biodiversity outcomes.
  • Weak pass-through: Farm subsidies may not materially reduce supermarket food prices.
  • Targeting issue: Without caps, larger landowners may capture a high share of support.

Safeguards

  • Cap payments by farm size and need.
  • Retain soil, water and flood-resilience conditions.
  • Publish food-security metrics and subsidy recipients.

Academic evidence

Auerbach and Gorodnichenko, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2012

Fiscal multipliers vary

Spending multipliers depend on economic slack, openness and policy context.

Informs GDP uncertainty from higher agricultural support.

Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy (2012)

UK government evidence

Reform UK, 2024

Reform spending claims

The Contract claims large savings from departments, QE reserves, aid, welfare and net zero.

Defines scenarios but needs caution.

Our Contract with You (2024)

Sources

Other Reform UK policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.