Conservative - Youth jobs
Create a GBP 5,000 First Job Bonus
Pay or credit up to GBP 5,000 for young people entering a first job, with eligibility still unspecified.
Last updated: May 2026.
Eligibility gap
The policy promises a GBP 5,000 First Job Bonus but does not specify age limits, earnings tests, tax treatment or whether the payment goes to workers or employers.
- Gross cost depends on take-up.
- Deadweight is likely high.
- Work incentives depend on design.
Core trade-offs
Eligible young workers gain cash support, and some may enter work faster. But many recipients would have taken jobs anyway, making the fiscal cost high per additional job created.
- Young starters gain the direct payment.
- Taxpayers fund a large transfer.
- Extra employment may be modest.
Fiscal impact by 2028-29
+GBP 0.5bn to +GBP 4.0bn. Central estimate: +GBP 1.5bn.
- Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
- Main cost is direct bonus payments.
- Extra tax and benefit savings are likely modest.
- Deadweight could be high.
- This is not an official costing.
Economic impact by 2028-29
- Jobs: Some entry into work may accelerate; deadweight likely substantial.
- Wages: Raises net income for eligible young workers, not underlying productivity.
- Prices: Little direct price effect expected.
- GDP / productivity: Small positive only if it creates extra employment, not just transfers cash.
Assessment
A first-job payment is simple and visible, but likely pays many young people who would have worked anyway. The economic case improves only if tightly targeted at NEET young people or combined with training and employer matching.
Confidence: Low. Payment size is clear; eligibility, take-up and additional employment are not.
Main risks
- Deadweight cost: Many recipients would enter work without the bonus.
- Gaming risk: Employers and workers may relabel short jobs to qualify.
- Poor targeting: Higher-income young workers may receive transfers with little employment effect.
Safeguards
- Target NEET or long-term unemployed young people.
- Require sustained employment before full payment.
- Publish deadweight and additionality estimates.
Academic evidence
Card, Kluve and Weber, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2018
Active labour market programmes
Training and activation programmes vary widely; impacts are often stronger over medium horizons than immediately.
Relevant where savings rely on moving claimants into sustained work.
What Works? A Meta Analysis of Active Labor Market Program Evaluations (2018)
Chetty, Journal of Political Economy, 2008
Welfare and job search
Unemployment insurance affects job search through both liquidity support and work incentives.
Shows welfare cuts can raise search pressure but also remove useful income smoothing.
Moral Hazard versus Liquidity and Optimal Unemployment Insurance (2008)
UK government evidence
Office for Budget Responsibility, 2026
OBR fiscal forecast
The OBR forecast sets the macro, borrowing and receipts baseline used for broad fiscal context.
Prevents treating tax cuts or spending changes as self-financing.
Department for Education, 2026
Apprenticeship statistics
Apprenticeship starts reached 226,620 in August-January 2025-26, with under-19s 23.6% of starts.
Anchors the scale of a 100,000-place expansion.
Sources
- PolicyLens methodology: Create a GBP 5,000 First Job Bonus Internal - PolicyLens, 2026
- Conservatives pledge to cut student loan interest Party policy source - Conservative Party, 2026
- Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026 Fiscal forecast - Office for Budget Responsibility, 2026
- Apprenticeships, academic year 2025/26 UK government statistics - Department for Education, 2026
- What Works? A Meta Analysis of Active Labor Market Program Evaluations Academic article - Card, Kluve and Weber, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2018
- Moral Hazard versus Liquidity and Optimal Unemployment Insurance Academic article - Chetty, Journal of Political Economy, 2008
- Our Plan for Britain Party policy source - Conservative Party, 2026
Other Conservative policies
PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.