PolicyLens

Reform UK - Migration tax

Add foreign-worker employer NI surcharge

Charge higher employer National Insurance for foreign workers, with health, care and microbusiness exemptions.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Tax design

Reform's 2024 Contract proposed a 20% employer NI rate for foreign workers, compared with 13.8% for British citizens, with stated exemptions.

  • Employer rate rises by 6.2 percentage points.
  • Health and care are exempted.
  • Reform claimed GBP 4bn a year.

Core trade-offs

The policy raises the cost of employing foreign workers and may encourage domestic hiring where substitutes exist. It also risks shortages, lower output and legal complexity.

  • Treasury may raise extra employer NI.
  • Foreign workers and exposed employers lose.
  • Output falls where substitution is hard.

Illustrative fiscal impact

-GBP 5.0bn to +GBP 1.0bn. Central estimate: -GBP 2.5bn.

  • Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • 20% NI rate is the main scale marker.
  • Gross costs and receipt offsets are separated in methodology.
  • Behaviour and pass-through widen the range.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2027-28

  • Jobs: Domestic substitution may rise, but vacancies and output losses are likely where skills are scarce.
  • Wages: May lift wages in some roles; migrants may bear costs indirectly.
  • Prices: Raises costs in sectors employing foreign workers, with pass-through likely.
  • GDP / productivity: Likely negative if it reduces labour supply and high-skill migration.

Assessment

This is not simply a revenue measure. It taxes one group of workers through employers and could reduce labour supply in sectors where domestic substitution is limited. Receipts may be positive, but GDP and productivity effects are likely negative if the surcharge deters high-skill or shortage-sector workers.

Confidence: Low. The nominal rate is clear, but payroll exposure, exemptions, legal design and substitution make the range wide.

Main risks

  • Shortage sectors: Exemptions may not cover all sectors where foreign labour is hard to replace.
  • Legal complexity: Nationality-based payroll taxation may face legal, administrative and treaty challenges.
  • Lower output: Reduced labour supply can lower GDP and other tax receipts.

Safeguards

  • Publish sector-by-sector payroll exposure.
  • Exempt roles on independent shortage evidence.
  • Use training levies instead of nationality taxes where possible.

Academic evidence

Dustmann and Frattini, Economic Journal, 2014

Fiscal effects of immigration

UK immigrant fiscal effects vary by origin, age, employment and qualification mix rather than by a single migrant average.

Warns against assuming a uniform fiscal gain from deterring foreign workers.

The Fiscal Effects of Immigration to the UK (2014)

Kleven, Landais and Saez, American Economic Review, 2013

Tax and mobile workers

Highly mobile high earners can respond strongly to tax differences across countries.

Supports caution for high-skilled recruitment and internationally mobile workers.

Taxation and International Migration of Superstars (2013)

UK government evidence

Reform UK, 2026

Current immigration plan

Reform pledges detention, deportation, treaty changes, no free housing or benefits, and stricter visas.

Current policy anchor.

Our Policies (2026)

Reform UK, 2025

Boriswave fiscal claim

Reform estimates a GBP 154bn discounted lifetime cost for a medium Boriswave settlement scenario.

Party-side context, not official costing.

The Cost of the Boriswave (2025)

Sources

Other Reform UK policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.