PolicyLens

Reform UK - Energy

Scrap net-zero subsidies

Remove net-zero policies, renewable subsidies and related levies while expanding domestic fossil-fuel production.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Policy scope

Reform pledges to scrap net-zero policies it says drive bills higher and to expand domestic energy production. The 2024 Contract claimed GBP 30bn annual savings.

  • Current page pledges cheaper energy.
  • Contract claimed GBP 30bn annual saving.
  • Existing contracts may limit savings.

Core trade-offs

Some bills or public costs may fall if schemes are cancelled. Investment certainty, emissions, supply-chain jobs and fossil-price exposure are likely to worsen.

  • Consumers may gain short-run bill relief.
  • Green investors and supply chains lose.
  • Climate and energy-risk costs rise.

Illustrative fiscal impact

-GBP 12.0bn to +GBP 10.0bn. Central estimate: -GBP 3.0bn.

  • Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • GBP 30bn claim is the main scale marker.
  • Gross costs and receipt offsets are separated in methodology.
  • Behaviour and pass-through widen the range.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2027-28

  • Jobs: Fossil sectors may gain; renewables, retrofit and grid-investment jobs likely lose.
  • Wages: No broad wage gain; sectoral pay shifts with investment flows.
  • Prices: Bills may fall short term if levies are cut, but gas-price exposure increases.
  • GDP / productivity: Likely negative long term through weaker investment certainty and climate-risk exposure.

Assessment

There may be some near-term bill or fiscal savings, but the GBP 30bn claim should not be treated as spendable cash without a contract-by-contract schedule. The likely long-run economic impact is negative if the policy deters energy investment and raises fossil-price exposure.

Confidence: Low. Reform's pledge is broad, while actual savings depend on levy design, contracts and compensation liabilities.

Main risks

  • Contract liabilities: Existing renewable contracts may require compensation or keep costs in place.
  • Investment shock: Abrupt reversal can raise the cost of capital for energy infrastructure.
  • Fossil exposure: More reliance on gas and oil leaves households exposed to global price spikes.

Safeguards

  • Publish a scheme-by-scheme repeal schedule.
  • Separate bill levies from Exchequer spending.
  • Keep grid and efficiency investments with positive paybacks.

Academic evidence

Metcalf and Stock, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2020

Carbon prices and macro effects

Observed European carbon taxes did not produce large negative macroeconomic effects.

Weakens the claim that climate policy is mainly an economy-wide drag.

The Macroeconomic Impact of Europe's Carbon Taxes (2020)

Andersson, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2019

Swedish carbon tax evidence

Sweden’s carbon tax reduced transport emissions relative to a synthetic-control comparison.

Relevant to emissions risk from weakening decarbonisation incentives.

Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study (2019)

Stern and review team, HM Treasury and Cambridge University Press, 2006

Long-run climate economics

Unpriced climate damages create long-run economic costs that conventional budgets may miss.

Explains why fiscal savings can come with external-cost risks.

The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (2006)

UK government evidence

Ofgem, 2026

Energy price cap

The April-June 2026 cap is GBP 1,641 for a typical dual-fuel direct-debit household.

Scale check for energy-bill relief.

Energy price cap explained (2026)

Sources

Other Reform UK policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.