PolicyLens

Green - Labour market

Cap organisation pay ratios at 10:1

Limit highest total remuneration to ten times the lowest full-time-equivalent pay in each organisation.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Binding cap

The estimate models an economy-wide legal cap, not the existing quoted-company disclosure regime.

  • Current law requires disclosure, not a cap.
  • FTSE 100 CEO pay gives only a scale check.
  • Avoidance risk is very high.

Core trade-offs

Lowest-paid workers may gain if firms lift the floor. Senior workers, shareholders, customers and taxpayers may bear costs. Firms may also outsource low-paid roles.

  • Low-paid workers may gain.
  • High earners lose taxable pay.
  • Firms may restructure around the cap.

Illustrative fiscal impact

-GBP 0.5bn to +GBP 5.0bn. Central estimate: +GBP 1.2bn.

  • Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Gross costs are separated from tax, NI and benefit offsets.
  • Private business costs are not automatically fiscal costs.
  • Behavioural responses widen the range materially.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2027-28

  • Jobs: Likely negative at the margin if firms outsource, split entities or relocate senior roles.
  • Wages: Could lift bottom pay, cut top pay, or both; incidence is uncertain.
  • Prices: Some firms may raise prices if they increase bottom pay.
  • GDP / productivity: Likely negative under a strict economy-wide cap; talent and restructuring risks are material.

Assessment

This is not a normal labour-market regulation. A binding 10:1 cap would change remuneration design, outsourcing incentives and executive location choices. The fiscal range is deliberately wide because the taxable remuneration above the threshold is not public.

Confidence: Low. The missing quantity is taxable remuneration above each organisation-specific 10:1 threshold.

Main risks

  • Avoidance design: Firms can shift pay into contractors, partnerships, shares, overseas roles or separate entities.
  • Tax-base loss: Cut high PAYE remuneration can reduce tax receipts unless profits or low pay rise.
  • Output risk: Rigid pay compression may reduce senior-role location or firm productivity.

Safeguards

  • Define total remuneration comprehensively.
  • Include contractors and group entities.
  • Require HMRC/Companies House audit data.

Academic evidence

Farber, Herbst, Kuziemko and Naidu, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2021

Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century

Unionisation historically reduced wage inequality, partly by compressing pay within and across workplaces.

Explains who may gain from collective-bargaining reforms.

Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century (2021)

UK government evidence

High Pay Centre, 2026

Fat Cat Day 2026

The High Pay Centre reports median FTSE 100 CEO pay of about GBP 4.4m.

Sizes executive-pay exposure, but not full-economy remuneration.

Fat Cat Day 2026 (2026)

Sources

Other Green policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.