PolicyLens

Green - Housing

Build 150,000 social homes

Fund 150,000 new social homes a year and end Right to Buy.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Policy baseline

The Green manifesto proposes 150,000 social homes annually. The cost depends on grant rates, land, borrowing and local capacity.

  • Targets social renters and councils.
  • Ending Right to Buy preserves stock.
  • Construction and land costs dominate.

Core trade-offs

The direct beneficiaries are low-income renters and councils. The costs fall mainly on taxpayers and landowners. The main economic question is capacity limits can delay completions.

  • Low-income renters and councils gain most directly.
  • Costs fall mainly on taxpayers and landowners.
  • Key risk: capacity limits can delay completions.

Fiscal impact by 2028-29

+GBP 8.0bn to +GBP 40.0bn. Central estimate: +GBP 18.0bn.

  • Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Main channel is the scored tax, spending or delivery change.
  • Offsets depend on tax receipts, behaviour and pass-through.
  • Range reflects uncertain implementation and economic response.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2028-29

  • Jobs: Construction jobs rise if planning, finance and skills constraints are resolved.
  • Wages: Construction wages may rise in shortages; renters and buyers gain from greater supply.
  • Prices: More supply should reduce price pressure; infrastructure costs may be partly passed on.
  • GDP / productivity: Likely positive if homes are additional and located near productive labour markets.

Assessment

This is a real trade-off, not a free gain. Low-income renters and councils benefit, while taxpayers and landowners bear most costs. Overall output depends on behaviour, capacity and pass-through.

Confidence: Medium-low. Higher on the policy target and fiscal channel; lower on behaviour, pass-through and economy-wide effects.

Main risks

  • Build-out risk: Planning approval does not guarantee completions if demand, finance or infrastructure are weak.
  • Infrastructure pressure: New homes need transport, schools, health and utilities funding.
  • Local resistance: Legal and political constraints can delay delivery.

Safeguards

  • Fund planning teams and infrastructure upfront.
  • Track completions, not permissions.
  • Target high-demand labour-market areas first.

Academic evidence

Glaeser and Gyourko, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018

Housing supply economics

Constrained housing supply raises prices and can damage mobility and productivity.

Explains why supply reform can raise GDP.

The Economic Implications of Housing Supply (2018)

UK government evidence

Green Party of England and Wales, 2024

Green manifesto

The manifesto defines the tax, spending, climate, housing and public-service proposals modelled here.

Used to define the scenario, not as an official costing.

Manifesto for a Fairer, Greener Country (2024)

Office for National Statistics, 2025

Housing supply indicators

ONS housing indicators show supply constraints and affordability pressures across UK housing markets.

Anchors the affected-market scale and supply-side caveat.

Housing supply indicators, UK (2025)

Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2024

IFS Green reaction

IFS warned Green spending plans involve very large additional public investment.

Supports wide fiscal bounds for housing capital policy.

Green Party manifesto: a reaction (2024)

Sources

Other Green policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.