PolicyLens

Green - Labour market

Replace zero-hours with guaranteed hours

Require guaranteed-hours contracts for regular variable-hours workers, with compensation for cancelled shifts.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Affected workers

The official ERA analysis cites about 2.4 million variable-hours workers affected by guaranteed-hours measures.

  • Official business cost is material.
  • Fiscal cost is mainly public exposure.
  • Flexibility loss is the bigger economic risk.

Core trade-offs

Variable-hours workers gain income security. Employers lose scheduling flexibility. In variable-demand sectors, fewer casual shifts and lower marginal hiring should be expected.

  • Workers gain predictable hours.
  • Employers lose flexibility.
  • Casual hiring likely falls.

Illustrative fiscal impact

+GBP 0.2bn to +GBP 3.0bn. Central estimate: +GBP 0.8bn.

  • Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Gross costs are separated from tax, NI and benefit offsets.
  • Private business costs are not automatically fiscal costs.
  • Behavioural responses widen the range materially.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2027-28

  • Jobs: Likely fewer marginal casual shifts and some lower hiring in variable-demand sectors.
  • Wages: Income volatility falls for workers receiving guaranteed hours.
  • Prices: Hospitality, care and retail may pass scheduling costs into prices.
  • GDP / productivity: Likely negative short run if flexibility loss exceeds planning gains.

Assessment

Guaranteed hours improve security for variable-hours workers but reduce employer flexibility. The policy should be assessed as a labour-cost and scheduling constraint, not as a free administrative change.

Confidence: Medium-low. Official costings exist, but a stronger ban would exceed them.

Main risks

  • Hours rationing: Employers may offer fewer shifts or avoid regular patterns.
  • Small-firm exposure: Demand volatility is harder for small firms to absorb.
  • Enforcement burden: Workers need fast remedies for cancelled shifts and avoidance.

Safeguards

  • Phase by regularity threshold.
  • Monitor shifts, not just jobs.
  • Use fast low-cost enforcement.

Academic evidence

Autor, Kerr and Kugler, Economic Journal, 2007

Does Employment Protection Reduce Productivity?

Employment-protection changes can reduce productivity where firms face higher firing and adjustment costs.

Supports caution on policies that raise dismissal, scheduling or adjustment costs.

Does Employment Protection Reduce Productivity? (2007)

UK government evidence

Department for Business and Trade, 2026

Employment Rights Act 2025 - Economic Analysis

The ERA economic analysis estimates around GBP 1bn annual direct business cost before social-care bargaining.

Provides official baseline costs and affected groups.

Employment Rights Act 2025 - Economic Analysis (2026)

Department for Business and Trade, 2026

Employment Rights Act 2025 impact assessments

The IA collection separates guaranteed hours, unfair dismissal, fire and rehire, union and equality measures.

Prevents treating broad rights packages as one undifferentiated pledge.

Employment Rights Act 2025 impact assessments (2026)

Sources

Other Green policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.